I don’t think lesbian necessarily means what you claim it means. Words and languages are fluid, adaptable.
And perhaps lesbian means something different in Japan . . .
Granted – the women are doing all kinds of things with men constantly thru the whole movie. So I don’t think its really lesbian either.
But can’t a lesbian activity, like a girl touching another girl’s nipples or clitoris, or licking or kissing or sucking her, be tagged lesbian because it’s a lesbian activity?
Even if it’s, say, while being penetrated by a man?
rezufan
4 days ago
Not lesbian. Literally has “creampie” in the title and there obviously are dudes. Gross.
So – applying what we can learn from the lesson of Schrödinger’s cat
Imagine if you will, that in an huge box, two women are licking each other.
They may be doing it because they are lesbians, enjoying being sexually active lesbians. Or, simultaneously, they may sense potential male involvement, and may be doing it in part to excite males who may be fortunate enough to see them going at it.
They continue, unobserved, and yet, when one looks in the box, one sees the women are eitherlesbians or not lesbians, not both lesbiansand not lesbians.
Does the simple fact that the women whose actions we see are women who know their actions may excite men mean that there will never really be any lesbians in movies the site posts. Does intentionally being sexual in ways that can excite men prevent that sexuality from being lesbian sexuality?
Perhaps even if they’re women with women only, but they know that sexually interested men will likely watch what they’re doing, they can’t be lesbians. Right? Because of the involvement of dudes.
![[MIGD-359] W real creampie: 4 hours, Tomoda Ayaka, Wakaba Kurumi](https://cdn.javmg.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/migd359pl.jpg)
Not lesbian, has dude in it.
How the hell can you tag something as “Lesbian” and “Creampie” simultaneously?!?
I don’t think lesbian necessarily means what you claim it means. Words and languages are fluid, adaptable.
And perhaps lesbian means something different in Japan . . .
Granted – the women are doing all kinds of things with men constantly thru the whole movie. So I don’t think its really lesbian either.
But can’t a lesbian activity, like a girl touching another girl’s nipples or clitoris, or licking or kissing or sucking her, be tagged lesbian because it’s a lesbian activity?
Even if it’s, say, while being penetrated by a man?
Not lesbian. Literally has “creampie” in the title and there obviously are dudes. Gross.
So – applying what we can learn from the lesson of Schrödinger’s cat
Imagine if you will, that in an huge box, two women are licking each other.
They may be doing it because they are lesbians, enjoying being sexually active lesbians. Or, simultaneously, they may sense potential male involvement, and may be doing it in part to excite males who may be fortunate enough to see them going at it.
They continue, unobserved, and yet, when one looks in the box, one sees the women are either lesbians or not lesbians, not both lesbians and not lesbians.
Does the simple fact that the women whose actions we see are women who know their actions may excite men mean that there will never really be any lesbians in movies the site posts. Does intentionally being sexual in ways that can excite men prevent that sexuality from being lesbian sexuality?
Perhaps even if they’re women with women only, but they know that sexually interested men will likely watch what they’re doing, they can’t be lesbians. Right? Because of the involvement of dudes.