Suppose if the goal is to make a lesbian movie, that perhaps no men should get to be in the sex scenes.
But does it become a “not lesbian” movie if there’s a man wearing clothes in it? I’ve read so many comments to this site that suggest that yes, any man means the movie shouldn’t be tagged lesbian.
I can’t help but respond negatively to this perspective. I can understand how those interested in female sexuality may not appreciate the aesthetic of a male form. This, however, should not preclude the appearance of males as plot development/conflict devices. No males would tend toward overly simplistic story lines. There is, in particular, the known plot of a marriage NTR by way of Lesbianism. How can this be achieved without the male Cuckold? Just venting I guess. For myself, a make character does not affect/effect (??) the lesbian categorization. “To Each, His Own”
Cool stuff. FA Pro . Platinum makes so many wonderful movies.
But Yasuda Daikichi didn’t get a sex scene in this one. Kind of surprising.
https://jav.guru/actor/安大吉/
Suppose if the goal is to make a lesbian movie, that perhaps no men should get to be in the sex scenes.
But does it become a “not lesbian” movie if there’s a man wearing clothes in it? I’ve read so many comments to this site that suggest that yes, any man means the movie shouldn’t be tagged lesbian.
I can’t help but respond negatively to this perspective. I can understand how those interested in female sexuality may not appreciate the aesthetic of a male form. This, however, should not preclude the appearance of males as plot development/conflict devices. No males would tend toward overly simplistic story lines. There is, in particular, the known plot of a marriage NTR by way of Lesbianism. How can this be achieved without the male Cuckold? Just venting I guess. For myself, a make character does not affect/effect (??) the lesbian categorization. “To Each, His Own”