Not meant to be a trick question, Mike. Merely seeking an educated opinion from a dedicated aficionado.
Anyway if you click on all the movies from label C, the girls all look so plain and ordinary. Damn, these guys even make Nao Jinguuji look frumpy, which is really saying something.
Given how visually perfect most things in Japan are, this approach HAS TO BE intentional. And I am struggling to understand the thought process behind it.
So, idol wise, JAVLand gave a credit here to Mikura Ayami. The AV-Wiki had her name as Yukikawa Ouka. Either way, I wasn’t familiar with her, and don’t know better than any other stranger really how her looks in this studio’s movie compare to her looks at other times in her career.
This label, that the site labelled “C” is labeled Gogos Core by the JAVLibrary site. They have records of Gogos Core movies back to C-700 in 2006, but I bet the label goes back about 700 movies earlier than that. . . .
JAVLibrary had the Go-go-zu studio’s videos generally going back to S-199 – Take 11 Brucella Live – Release Date: 2004-03-17. But I bet the label goes back about 199 movies earlier than that. . .
109 pages of thumbnails, 20 movies a page, about 2,290 movies one could click thru to see whether many other idols the “caliber” of Jinguuji Nao have been in the studio’s movies, (if they looked relatively frumpy, compared to their glamorous best, etc).
Its not a project I want to start. Perhaps someone who already knows the studio’s movies could lend an educated opinion. . .
Dowdy and old-fashioned (typically used of a woman or her clothes). When you look frumpy, your clothes are out of date and also modest, boring, or drab. Frumpy is the opposite of stylish.
Just trying to get a grip on it. How could anyone make Jinguuji Nao look frumpy?
![[C-2824] The history of married woman Kanade](https://cdn.javmg.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/140c2824pl.jpg)
I don’t understand this studio. Their focus seems to be on rather average looking women. A realism fetish, perhaps.
Pray, what sayeth thee, Lord Mike, most worthy Golden State Fapmeister?
Not meant to be a trick question, Mike. Merely seeking an educated opinion from a dedicated aficionado.
Anyway if you click on all the movies from label C, the girls all look so plain and ordinary. Damn, these guys even make Nao Jinguuji look frumpy, which is really saying something.
Given how visually perfect most things in Japan are, this approach HAS TO BE intentional. And I am struggling to understand the thought process behind it.
So, idol wise, JAVLand gave a credit here to Mikura Ayami. The AV-Wiki had her name as Yukikawa Ouka. Either way, I wasn’t familiar with her, and don’t know better than any other stranger really how her looks in this studio’s movie compare to her looks at other times in her career.
This label, that the site labelled “C” is labeled Gogos Core by the JAVLibrary site. They have records of Gogos Core movies back to C-700 in 2006, but I bet the label goes back about 700 movies earlier than that. . . .
JAVLibrary had the Go-go-zu studio’s videos generally going back to S-199 – Take 11 Brucella Live – Release Date: 2004-03-17. But I bet the label goes back about 199 movies earlier than that. . .
109 pages of thumbnails, 20 movies a page, about 2,290 movies one could click thru to see whether many other idols the “caliber” of Jinguuji Nao have been in the studio’s movies, (if they looked relatively frumpy, compared to their glamorous best, etc).
Its not a project I want to start. Perhaps someone who already knows the studio’s movies could lend an educated opinion. . .
Jinguuji Nao frumpy?
Dowdy and old-fashioned (typically used of a woman or her clothes). When you look frumpy, your clothes are out of date and also modest, boring, or drab. Frumpy is the opposite of stylish.
Just trying to get a grip on it. How could anyone make Jinguuji Nao look frumpy?
Mikura Ayami?
Yukikawa Ouka?
Are these two names for the same person?