So troll – Does this mean every time there is an ” I Am Mike” in the comments, you are having more “fun” twisting the heroic, principled deception from the movie Spartacus while you post with someone else’s name? Like with the April 15, 7:30 a.m. troll post:
“Mike Reply to Mike
I am the real Mike.
Sorry to sound like the Spartacus movie.
You’re the one trolling me.”
BTW, I had asked just after Easter why there was a break from the trolling on Easter Sunday. I wrote:
“Mike Reply to Mike
You’d have had a better tone if you’d referenced Monty Python’s Life of Brian. Especially so soon after Easter. An entire group of convicts facing crucifixion all claiming to be Brian, when they hear Brian is eligible for release
“I’m Brian.”
“No, I’m Brian.”
“I’m Brian and so’s my wife.”
On a serious note. Still curious. Why didn’t you troll on Easter Sunday?”
I’m still curious. Why didn’t you troll on Easter Sunday?”
In last year’s July 14 and July 21 issues of weekly magazine Shukan Bunshun, Saki Kozai, a 30-year-old porn star, exposed the corrupt practices of her talent agency.
In the articles, Kozai revealed her history of being brainwashed by the agency’s chief. She also described being forced to make her adult video (AV) debut — she was told she was working on a modeling assignment — and offer sexual favors as a form of business entertainment.
And it’s interesting to read a comment by a different “Mike” that isn’t a troll comment – not in its “four corners” at least. . .
But yet it’s right below a comment that looks like it clearly is a troll comment. Part of a barrage of comments (over 40 on May 15) by someone else or a number of others posting as “Mike.” See list of the May 16 comments at the comment “Mike”
![[SOE-946] Volunteer for Irrumatio Slave – Office Lady Who Can’t Do Her Job is an Excellent Oral Toilette – Saki Kasai](https://cdn.javsts.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/soe946pl.jpg)
Saki claimed she was brainwashed and raped when she shot these movies, which makes the irrumatio all the more satisfying for us degenerate fucks 😀
Source?
No. I am Spartacus. Errrrr … I mean I am Mike.
🙂
So troll – Does this mean every time there is an ” I Am Mike” in the comments, you are having more “fun” twisting the heroic, principled deception from the movie Spartacus while you post with someone else’s name? Like with the April 15, 7:30 a.m. troll post:
“Mike Reply to Mike
I am the real Mike.
Sorry to sound like the Spartacus movie.
You’re the one trolling me.”
BTW, I had asked just after Easter why there was a break from the trolling on Easter Sunday. I wrote:
“Mike Reply to Mike
You’d have had a better tone if you’d referenced Monty Python’s Life of Brian. Especially so soon after Easter. An entire group of convicts facing crucifixion all claiming to be Brian, when they hear Brian is eligible for release
“I’m Brian.”
“No, I’m Brian.”
“I’m Brian and so’s my wife.”
On a serious note. Still curious. Why didn’t you troll on Easter Sunday?”
I’m still curious. Why didn’t you troll on Easter Sunday?”
In last year’s July 14 and July 21 issues of weekly magazine Shukan Bunshun, Saki Kozai, a 30-year-old porn star, exposed the corrupt practices of her talent agency.
In the articles, Kozai revealed her history of being brainwashed by the agency’s chief. She also described being forced to make her adult video (AV) debut — she was told she was working on a modeling assignment — and offer sexual favors as a form of business entertainment.
tokyoreporter.com/entertainment/adult-video/av-actress-saki-kozai-continues-porn-career-despite-blowing-whistle-on-industry
Well, that’s very interesting in at least two ways, maybe more.
The post was approved with a hyperlink to an article about JAV.
I remember trying to post a link to an article, about a year ago, when discussing the sad circumstances of the death of Aida Asuka.
The site didn’t post it. . . (That was back about when the site posted a sub of [MADM-091] (English subbed) Aphrodisiac lingerie . . . Yuika Takashima (See Mike – Reply to MILF love) There were other times too. . .
And it’s interesting to read a comment by a different “Mike” that isn’t a troll comment – not in its “four corners” at least. . .
But yet it’s right below a comment that looks like it clearly is a troll comment. Part of a barrage of comments (over 40 on May 15) by someone else or a number of others posting as “Mike.” See list of the May 16 comments at the comment “Mike”
Interesting. . .